The conflicting rulings in the cases of R v Khan and R v Pace and Rogers means that the law regarding the mess rea of criminal attempts is unclear at best.’ With reference to relevant case law, statute and academic commentary critically analyse the statement set out above.

Question 1

The conflicting rulings in the cases of R v Khan and R v Pace and Rogers means that the law regarding the mess rea of criminal attempts is unclear at best.’
With reference to relevant case law, statute and academic commentary critically analyse the statement set out above.

(100 marks)

Question 2

The law of manslaughter captures anything from an act just short of murder to a defendant who pushes someone over, bangs their head and dies, and anything in between. The law is too broad and clearly infringes the principle of fair labelling.’
Critically analyse the statement set out above with reference to relevant case law, statute and academic commentary.
(100 marks)

Last Completed Projects