Does the control serve as a good basis of comparison to validate the experiment? If not, what could the authors have used for a better control?Explain

Photosynthesis Research

Both of the links below are for the Photosynthesis article that is the topic of this peer review.

Article Title and author: “Temperature-sensitive PSII: a novel approacgoch for sustained photosynthesis hydrogen production”

https://www.researchgate.net/journal/Photosynthesis-Research-1573-5079/publication/297655398_Temperature-sensitive_PSII_a_novel_approach_for_sustained_photosynthetic_hydrogen_production/links/5fbfc03d299bf104cf7ae599/Temperature-sensitive-PSII-a-novel-approach-for-sustained-photosynthetic-hydrogen-production.pdf

OR

https://www.dropbox.com/s/06asfvt6npwtpyx/Temperature-sensitive_PSII_a_novel_approach_for_su.pdf?dl=0

Critical Thinking Questions

1. Does the data support the conclusion? Why or why not?

2. Does the control serve as a good basis of comparison to validate the experiment? If not, what could the authors have used for a better control?

3. Was the sample size used in the study sufficient to support the conclusions?

Last Completed Projects