Discuss how the new knowledge that you have gained from reviewing the other person’s tool has added to your knowledge in the area of cultural inclusion in educational contexts. Detail how you would then make improvements to your own tool. Use in-text references to support your choices not just opinion.

• Cultural inclusion of Indigenous Australians • Cultural inclusivity in the classroom

Instructions

How

You will be provided with a copy of someone else’s submission. Research and respond to the approach taken as opposed to that chosen and used by yourself.

Preparation
Analysis and Critique about the approach taken by another student.
Read through thoroughly and make a judgement on the validity of the approach taken. Provide justification, and substantiate any statements you make. Compare and contrast to your own approach. In-text reference as often as possible to support your statements and decisions. *This is important to support your claims and not just appear to be providing your own opinion.
Presentation as a Report, 2700 words

Critique & Analysis

Provide some structure to your response,

1. Describe the other person’s tool and the methods chosen. Include the references cited that were used to substantiate the choices made. Discuss the relevance or validity of this approach to the creation of the Tool.

2. Identify the strengths, assumptions and limitations or areas of potential improvement in the other person’s submission. Support your statements with in-text referencing.

3. Compare their approach to your own. (theory, research, methods, tool creation, diagnostic aspects) Support with in-text references.

4. Discuss how the new knowledge that you have gained from reviewing the other person’s tool has added to your knowledge in the area of cultural inclusion in educational contexts. Detail how you would then make improvements to your own tool. Use in-text references to support your choices not just opinion.

Assessment topic relate to

cultural inclusion of Indigenous Australians
cultural inclusivity in the classroom

Suggested structure of the report

Critique & Analysis

Executive summary
Self-explanatory
Background/introduction

Explanation of the purpose of the task and how you intend to complete it. Introduce the key terms of cultural inclusion and the significance in Australian educational setting with regards to Indigenous students.

Review of the literature

Analysis and Critique about the approach taken by another student. Read through thoroughly and make a judgement on the validity of the approach taken. Provide justification and substantiate any statements you make with references.

Describe the other person’s tool and the methods chosen. Include the references cited that were used to substantiate the choices made. Discuss the relevance or validity of this approach to the creation of the Tool.

Identify the strengths, assumptions and limitations or areas of potential improvement in the other person’s submission. Support your statements with in-text referencing.

Discussion
Make a comparison and contrast between your own (theory, research, methods, tool creation, diagnostic aspects) and the other student’s approach

In-text reference as often as possible to support your statements and decisions.

Discuss how the new knowledge that you have gained from reviewing the other person’s tool has added to your knowledge in the area of cultural inclusion in educational contexts.

Make sure to finally end your comparison by highlighting what you would change in your own submission to improve it.

Detail how you would then make improvements to your own tool. Use in-text references to support your choices not just opinion.

Conclusion

Self-explanatory

REFERENCES

Last Completed Projects