Are the proposed solutions offered in this article, if any, feasible or practical in real-world terms? Explain why or why not?

Answer the following questions using the format below as headings. You must answer all questions for each article. The length of each article reflection reviewed must be 2‐3 pages (Times New Roman 12 font, double ‐spaced, APA style). Before answering the questions, please reference the article in APA format at the top of page one.
Questions to be answered:
1. What are the major questions raised by the author(s) of the article?
2. What are the underlying assumptions or theoretical unpinning of this article?
3. What methodology was used? (Design, data source(s), analytic approach)
4. What are the main conclusions reached by the author(s)?
5. What theoretical or methodological contribution does the author’s work make to the field of health disparities or health equity?
6. In what specific ways is the author’s argument intellectually unsatisfying, inconsistent, or incomplete?
7. Are the proposed solutions offered in this article, if any, feasible or practical in real-world terms? Explain why or why not?
8. What additional questions does this work raise and how might you go about investigating those?
Public Health Question
Please answer the following questions using the format below as headings. You must answer all questions for each article. The length of each article reflection reviewed must be 2‐3 pages (Times New Roman 12 font, double ‐spaced, APA style). Before answering the questions, please reference the article in APA format at the top of page one.
Questions to be answered:
1. What are the major questions raised by the author(s) of the article?
2. What are the underlying assumptions or theoretical unpinning of this article?
3. What methodology was used? (Design, data source(s), analytic approach)
4. What are the main conclusions reached by the author(s)?
5. What theoretical or methodological contribution does the author’s work make to the field of health disparities or health equity?
6. In what specific ways is the author’s argument intellectually unsatisfying, inconsistent, or incomplete?
7. Are the proposed solutions offered in this article, if any, feasible or practical in real-world terms? Explain why or why not?
8. What additional questions does this work raise and how might you go about investigating those?

Last Completed Projects