Summarize the op-doc that the writer chose to work with. What was the filmmakers’ thesis and purpose? What is the writer’s thesis? According to the writer, what features made the op-doc successful or unsuccessful? List them here.

Post the rough draft of Essay #2: Op-Doc Review. Do this ASAP! We don’t want a flood of essays on Sunday night. This peer review will be worth 25 points. It’s a lot, I know. You’ll get 5 points for just posting your own essay–make sure the file works, or you can copy and paste it. Either is fine.

– Complete these questions for at least two of your classmates’ essays. Answer in full sentences–give specifics! Peer review is important stuff! Follow these questions, and number your responses. That makes it easier for everyone to read. Each peer review will be worth 10 points, so the more specific and detailed you are, the more likely you are to get full credit here!

-choose essays with the fewest number of posts to respond to. That way, you will help ensure everyone gets feedback.

What worked well? Give a compliment
Summarize the op-doc that the writer chose to work with. What was the filmmakers’ thesis and purpose?
What is the writer’s thesis? According to the writer, what features made the op-doc successful or unsuccessful? List them here.
What does the writer say about the film’s music, color choices, or imagery? Could you picture these style choices? Why or why not?
Where were you confused? What could you offer in terms of suggestions?
How did the writer connect his or her own life to this op-doc?

attached files are the peer responses that each need a response to

Last Completed Projects