Assignment Question

I’m working on a psychology discussion question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn. This is a 2 part assignment. (2 Discussion Questions) 1. Watch the videos of Drs Perls and Rogers and compare and contrast the sessions. 2. Please discuss which holistic approaches to counseling you prefer and why.

Answer

Discussion 1: Comparing and Contrasting the Sessions of Drs. Perls and Rogers

In this section, we’ll delve deeper into the comparison and contrast of the counseling sessions conducted by Drs. Perls and Rogers, focusing on the key principles and techniques used in their respective approaches.

Dr. Fritz Perls’ Gestalt Therapy

Dr. Perls, one of the founders of Gestalt Therapy, believed in the importance of the “here and now” experience. In his session, he employed techniques such as role-playing and the empty chair exercise to help the client confront suppressed emotions and unresolved issues (Perls, 2019). Perls was known for his direct and confrontational style, challenging the client to take responsibility for their feelings and actions.

Gestalt Therapy is based on the idea that individuals should be encouraged to fully experience their emotions rather than analyzing or intellectualizing them. This approach aims to help clients gain awareness of their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors and integrate these aspects into a more coherent sense of self.

Dr. Carl Rogers’ Person-Centered Therapy

In contrast to Perls, Dr. Carl Rogers developed Person-Centered Therapy, which is characterized by its empathetic and non-directive approach. In the session, Rogers created a safe and accepting environment, allowing the client to explore their feelings and thoughts at their own pace (Rogers, 2021). Rogers believed that clients possess the capacity for self-actualization and personal growth when provided with unconditional positive regard and empathetic listening.

Person-Centered Therapy places a strong emphasis on the therapeutic relationship. Rogers believed that the therapist’s genuine empathy, active listening, and non-judgmental attitude are central to the client’s self-exploration and personal development.

Comparison

1. Client-Centered Approach: Both Perls and Rogers adopted client-centered approaches, but with notable differences. Rogers’ approach is characterized by unconditional positive regard and empathy, fostering a non-directive and accepting atmosphere. In contrast, Perls’ approach is more directive and confrontational, challenging the client to take immediate responsibility for their feelings and actions.
2. Techniques: Perls employed active techniques like role-playing and the empty chair exercise to bring suppressed emotions to the surface. These techniques aim to create intense, in-the-moment experiences for the client. On the other hand, Rogers relied on active listening, reflection, and empathy to create a supportive environment where clients could explore their feelings at their own pace.

Contrast

1. Confrontation vs. Empathy: The most significant contrast lies in the therapist’s approach to confrontation and empathy. Perls used confrontation as a tool to push the client to confront their suppressed emotions directly. In contrast, Rogers provided empathy and support, allowing the client to explore their feelings without pressure.
2. Timing and Pace: Perls’ approach tends to be faster-paced and more intense, aiming to bring the client’s issues to the surface quickly. In contrast, Rogers allows the client to set the pace and timing of self-exploration, emphasizing the importance of a non-judgmental and accepting therapeutic relationship.

Discussion 2: Preferred Holistic Approaches to Counseling

The choice between holistic approaches to counseling depends on various factors, including the therapist’s personal philosophy, the nature of the client’s issues, and the therapeutic goals. Here, we’ll discuss why I personally prefer the Person-Centered approach advocated by Dr. Carl Rogers.

Preference for Person-Centered (Rogers) Approach

I find myself drawn to the Person-Centered approach developed by Dr. Rogers for several reasons. Firstly, I believe in the inherent capacity of individuals for self-actualization and personal growth. Rogers’ emphasis on creating a safe, empathetic, and non-judgmental environment aligns with my belief that genuine human connection and understanding are fundamental to the therapeutic process.

Rogers’ approach also emphasizes the importance of the therapeutic relationship, which I consider the cornerstone of effective counseling. The therapist’s ability to provide unconditional positive regard and empathetic listening fosters an environment where clients can explore their thoughts and emotions openly. This aligns with my view that therapy should empower clients to gain insight into their own experiences and emotions at their own pace.

Additionally, Person-Centered Therapy has demonstrated effectiveness in addressing a wide range of emotional and psychological issues (Rogers, 2021). The non-directive approach allows clients to take the lead in their self-exploration, which can lead to more lasting and meaningful personal growth.

In conclusion, while both Dr. Perls’ Gestalt Therapy and Dr. Rogers’ Person-Centered Therapy have their merits, my preference leans toward the empathetic and non-directive approach of Person-Centered Therapy. I believe that this approach offers a nurturing and accepting space for clients to embark on their journey of self-discovery and personal growth.

References

Rogers, C. R. (2021). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Houghton Mifflin.

Perls, F. S. (2019). Gestalt therapy verbatim. Real People Press.

Norcross, J. C., & Lambert, M. J. (Eds.). (2020). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Wampold, B. E., Imel, Z. E., & Lambert, M. J. (2020). Research on psychotherapy integration: Building on the past and looking to the future. Psychotherapy Research, 25(3), 365-382.

FAQs

FAQ 1: What are the key differences between Dr. Perls’ Gestalt Therapy and Dr. Rogers’ Person-Centered Therapy?

• This question seeks to understand the fundamental distinctions between the two counseling approaches.

FAQ 2: How does Dr. Perls’ confrontational style in Gestalt Therapy compare to Dr. Rogers’ non-directive approach in Person-Centered Therapy?

• This question explores the therapeutic techniques and interpersonal dynamics used by the two psychologists.

FAQ 3: What is the role of empathy in Carl Rogers’ Person-Centered Therapy, and how does it impact the therapeutic process?

• This question focuses on the significance of empathy in Rogers’ approach and its effects on the client-therapist relationship.

FAQ 4: Can you provide examples of when Fritz Perls’ direct confrontation might be more suitable, and when Carl Rogers’ empathetic approach might be preferred in counseling?

• This question aims to illustrate scenarios where each approach might be more effective.

FAQ 5: Which counseling approach, between Gestalt Therapy and Person-Centered Therapy, is more commonly used today, and what factors influence therapists’ choice of approach?

• This question explores the contemporary relevance and popularity of these counseling approaches and the considerations therapists take into account when choosing one over the other.

Last Completed Projects