In the article by Garland, what was the historian’s strongest piece of evidence or line of reasoning? What was her weakest evidence?

Evaluate the secondary source readings (PDFs of sources are attached) and answer the following questions.

• In the article by Lawson, what was the strongest piece of evidence or line of reasoning? What was the weakest evidence or line of reasoning?
• In the article by Garland, what was the historian’s strongest piece of evidence or line of reasoning? What was her weakest evidence?
• Which article do you think made the strongest overall case?
• What are your reasons for this conclusion?

Last Completed Projects