What is, in your mind, the most important aspects of the contemporary international system, and how long has this order existed? Argue for your answer in theoretical terms, utilizing Buzan and Little’s toolbox.

In the book International Systems in World History, Barry Buzan and Richard Little suggest that in
order to periodise (separate in time) different international systems, one must pay attention to the type
of unit that dominates. On this notion, they present their own periodization (see page 394 where they
compare their suggestion with those of other scholars) of international systems. According to them,
the latest primary turning point in world history, from an IR-perspective, is ca. 1500 AD.
You may of course believe that unit-change is important and still come up with other dates. Let us say
that you believe that the development of the welfare state and industrial states or democracies, are of
decisive importance and select the late 19th or early 20th century as the latest turning point. Perhaps
the development of modern nationalism and ideological political movements make you pick 1789 and
the French Revolution as the beginnings of the contemporary system. Maybe the de-colonization
process of the 1950s and 1960s marks the start. Perhaps it isn’t change of units that is of primary
importance at all. A neorealist could, based on ideas of polarity, say that the latest turning point is the
end of the Cold War when the system switched from a bi-polar to a uni- or multipolar structure. Others
would mention globalization and post-industrial society, etc.

Think through the following questions: What is, in your mind, the most important aspects of the
contemporary international system, and how long has this order existed? Argue for your answer
in theoretical terms, utilizing Buzan and Little’s toolbox. Prepare to discuss your answer at the
first seminar.

Last Completed Projects