Is compatibilism “a wretched subtrefuge” (Kant) and a “quagmire of evasion” (James)? Or is it instead a welcome alternative to (some) metaphysicians’s tendencies to give a metaphysically inflationary account of what free choice and free will consist in?
Is compatibilism “a wretched subtrefuge” (Kant) and a “quagmire of evasion” (James)? Or is it instead a welcome alternative to (some) metaphysicians’s tendencies to give a metaphysically inflationary account of what free choice and free will consist in?