court Archives - Page 3 of 3

There are some who say that the Miranda ruling has outlived its usefulness and should be replaced, along with the exclusionary rule. In addition, some argue that the Miranda ruling as well as the exclusionary rule should be tougher, not more lenient. Take a stand in this paper and explain the validity of your argument on whether the Miranda rule should be replaced, remain, or be tougher.

Posted on September 10, 2020 by Ambrose

Once you’ve read Chapters 5 & 6, search the Web for information on Miranda v. Arizona. In at least 2 pages, please answer and include the following questions and information: Who was Ernesto Miranda and why is his name linked to virtually every police interview or interrogation? Research Ernesto Miranda’s personal history, including his family, […]

Posted on September 4, 2020 by Ambrose

In Mapp v Ohio and Weeks v U.S., the Court ruled that a frisk does not constitute a search. Explain the differences between a frisk and a search. What is the importance of understanding these differences?

Outline the basic primary arguments of the opinions written in support of and dissenting from the same-sex marriage decision, Obergefell v Hodges.

Posted on September 4, 2020 by Ambrose

Final Paper Instructions Your Final Paper will outline the basic primary arguments of the opinions written in support of and dissenting from the same-sex marriage decision, Obergefell v Hodges. The concern in this assignment is not your personal view of the topic or even how you see it through a Christian worldview. Rather, it is […]

Write a court report from a dictated, ‘prosecution opening’ of a Crown court trial.

Posted on August 18, 2020 by Ambrose

In the resit of the accuracy exam, you will be required to write a court report from a dictated, ‘prosecution opening’ of a Crown court trial. The report should be written as if for publication in a local newspaper that day. Remember to use your court reporting checklist and ensure your copy contains all the […]

Explain the ruling of the court and its business relevance in no more than 1–2 paragraphs. Was there a dissenting opinion? If so, explain why some of the judges or justices disagreed with the majority in the decision.

Posted on August 13, 2020 by Ambrose

First select an actual business-related U.S. legal case, pertaining to the topic of contract law, based on briefly conducting associated research. Based on that, you will then select an organization that you believe would be impacted by that legal case. Use credible legal research databases and online resources, research federal and state court cases, and […]

Essay Quoll

Tag: court

Outline the basic primary arguments of the opinions written in support of and dissenting from the same-sex marriage decision, Obergefell v Hodges.

Write a court report from a dictated, ‘prosecution opening’ of a Crown court trial.

Explain the ruling of the court and its business relevance in no more than 1–2 paragraphs. Was there a dissenting opinion? If so, explain why some of the judges or justices disagreed with the majority in the decision.