Statute and academic commentary Archives

Use code EQ20 to get 20% OFF on your first order!

The conflicting rulings in the cases of R v Khan and R v Pace and Rogers means that the law regarding the mess rea of criminal attempts is unclear at best.’ With reference to relevant case law, statute and academic commentary critically analyse the statement set out above.

Posted on May 12, 2021 by Ambrose

Question 1 The conflicting rulings in the cases of R v Khan and R v Pace and Rogers means that the law regarding the mess rea of criminal attempts is unclear at best.’ With reference to relevant case law, statute and academic commentary critically analyse the statement set out above. (100 marks) Question 2 The […]

Using case law, statute and academic commentary, critically analyse this statement in respect of the law of adverse possession and the moral arguments that surround it.

Posted on April 20, 2021 by Ambrose

Description Essay question on adverse possession The question is: ‘Now that most of that case law is redundant, all these good stories with their contentious moral messages will go unread. As adverse possession becomes a simple application of rules, like conveyancing and land registration we lose one more opportunity to encourage students to think about […]

Chat with usLiveChat

Essay Quoll

Tag: Statute and academic commentary

The conflicting rulings in the cases of R v Khan and R v Pace and Rogers means that the law regarding the mess rea of criminal attempts is unclear at best.’ With reference to relevant case law, statute and academic commentary critically analyse the statement set out above.

Using case law, statute and academic commentary, critically analyse this statement in respect of the law of adverse possession and the moral arguments that surround it.