Description
chapter one is perfect but lack of proof reading. also writer said mediation is only method for adr, not correct. and tutor said even the issues are current but descriptive. it means no critical analysing which was one of the pre condition.
i want writer not to write the similar way like chapter one. put argument counter argument analize critically and finally put own opinion in each chapter. conclude each chapter
i want five chapter in total. first chapter topic will be same as provided. every chapter will need to start a question like first chapter. so the writer need to produce 4 questions for each chapters. then the writer need to find the answer of the question through critical analysing i repeat no description unless it necessary.
chapter question and subquestions need to be argumentative, current, related with English court practice which a barrister would face in a daily life. use recent articles law and documents. when done relate it with my main title of the dissertation. as said before put own opinion or analyzation
put small conclusion for each chapter as word is limited.
comparison with foreign system or any foreign article could be used but not more than 25 percent of the research as this paper based on purely english legal system. please go through attached documents. title of the each chapter should be a question. for example the first chapter dealt with cost, the second chapter might be confidentiality while talking about it just do not forget to include pre judice rule
third one related with recent problem with family law mediation ( like one mediator could work for two parties when they are going to be separated or getting divorce and arguing for child custody, it is possible for mediator to serve justice while working for both?) there are lots of other problem in family mediation. i want a chapter of family law mediation adreesing all curent problems . for every problem raise a question (sub question of the chapter) and analise the thing critically.
fourth one could be related whether mediation serve justice ? subquestion could be is mediator act like judge of the court? is mediation better than other adr services for instance arbitration, ene, ed, negociation? hybrid system mixing arbitration with mediation.
fith chapter could be covid situation and online mediation related.
the research i did so far these i found current topics . writer might add or change since not me he/s is the expert and finally writing
lastly conclude that mediation is a parallel process (not in all sector) not replacing English court. there are other adr process. completely replacement of the court not possible, as in criminal sector mediation does not apply. but it has bright future in some area it takes over court position and has both successful and unsuccessful rate.(provide some data before conclusion in the chapter)
do not forget to put your opinion before conclusion. it is applicable for final conclusion too.
jackson report , case halsey vs melton kenneys and lomax vs lomax these are significant and important documents without these no research could possible. include those in a mail body as much as u can
each chapter deal with one question and that should be clear specific and narrow and include one issue. follow the pattern of chapter one. plz do not forgot to write chapter one , use same materials and everything but write those things in a form of analyzing not description.
use current articles not old one unless it necessary. tutor said to add law society gazette where barristers and solicitors write related their practising problem related with adr or mediation.
give me draft of each chapter
