Write a 3 page (not including the works td page) research paper using one primary source (the novel) and at least 4 secondary sources (this includes books, periodicals, and online) — FIVE total references. The pumose of the secondary sources is to back up your opinion/argument of the topic, not to be the driving force behind your ideas. So, first develop your idea, expand upon it with literary analysis (i.e. link to a passage(s) in the novel), then find outside sources to support your claims. Use MLA format — 12-point Times New Rornan font, double spaced.
Topic:
Analyze the use of Bokanovsky’s Process in the novel and compare/contrast it to real-life advancements in cloning. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a science?
Sources (MLA Way):
Connor, Steve. “Animal Cloning Can Save Endangered Species.” Cloning, edited by
Jacqueline Langwith. Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale M Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/.3010383246/OVIC?u=va_s_007_0162/ksid=OVIC&xid=5 a4da0db.
Originally published as “The Big Question: Could Cloning Be the Anssver to Saving Endangered Species from Extinction?” Mdependent, 3 Feb. 2009. Gjerris, Micky, a. Peter Sandoe.
“Animal Cloning.” Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, edited by J. Baird Callicott and Robert Frodeman. vol. 1, Macmillan Reference USA, 2009, pp. 4042.
Gale M Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.corniapps/doc/CX3234100024/OVIC?u=va_s_007_01628,sid=OVIC&xid=7 bb48fdf.
Huxley. Aldous. BRAVE NEW WORLD. Chatto and M’indus. 1932.
Pacelle, Mayne. “Animal Cloning Is Unethical.” Cloning, edited by Tamara L.
Roleff, Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale M Context: Opposing
Viewpoints, link.gale.comJapps/doc/EJ3010383210/OVIC?u=va_s_007_0162&sid=OVIC&xid=6 433aa76. 2021. Originally published “Is Animal Cloning Ethical?” wwmsfgate.com, 21 Jan. 2005. Shanks, Pete. “Pet Cloning and Endangered Species Cloning Are Terrible Ideas.
” Cloning. edited by Jacqueline Lang.’s. Creenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/EJ3010383247/OVIC?u=va_s_007_0162&sid=OVICSixid=b b458140. Originally published “Cloning for Kicks,” GeneWatch, vol. 22, no. 5, 4 Oct. 2009.
