‘Adverse possession is an anathema today. The preponderance of land is now registered. Vague, imprecise, and informal claims to property founded on the obscure and unreliable notions of relativity of title should have no role to play. Romanticism has nearly been replaced with rationality. The job should be finished, and adverse possession must become a thing of the past.’ Crtically discuss

Description

 

1) The answer should be in Word document

2) Referencing should not be included as well as bibliography, the answer should look like it was written in my own words

3) There are TWO questions to be answered. One question should be approximately 1000 words.

 

1. ‘Adverse possession is an anathema today. The preponderance of land is now registered. Vague, imprecise, and informal claims to property founded on the obscure and unreliable notions of relativity of title should have no role to play. Romanticism has nearly been replaced with rationality. The job should be finished, and adverse possession must become a thing of the past.’ Crtically discuss (~1000 words)

2. ‘If a mortgagor can grant a mortgage to a mortgagee, then the mortgagor can understand the fact that they have likely borrowed a hefty sum of money. With borrowing money comes a risk that a mortgagor finds themselves in a position unable to repay the debt. In these instances, the law should favour the mortgagee. The market is well placed to regulate stakeholders’ behaviour. Attempts in the law to favour mortgagors, especially when it comes to repossessions, are unnecessary.’ Critically discuss

Last Completed Projects