You are to submit a student brief of Pierce v. Ortho, which can be found at
https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1980/84-n-j-58-0.html
Student brief Structure
These can be extensive or short, depending on the depth of analysis required and the demands of the instructor. A comprehensive brief includes the following elements:
1. Title and Citation
Make sure you write the full citation as set forth in the case. For example the U.S. Supreme Court is usually cited as follows (example), “Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967)”; The NJ Supreme Court, likewise is cited usually, as follows (example), “Tarr v. Ciasulli, 181 N.J. 70 (2004).” The title of the case shows who is opposing whom. The name of the person who initiated legal action in that particular court will always appear first. Since the losers often appeal to a higher court, this can get confusing. The first section of this guide shows you how to identify the players without a scorecard.
The citation tells how to locate the reporter of the case in the appropriate case reporter. If in the future, you do not know how to cite a certain court, google it – there are plenty of online sources.
2. Facts of the Case
A good student brief will include a summary of the pertinent facts and legal points raised in the case. It will show the nature of the litigation, who sued whom, based on what occurrences, and what happened in the lower court/s.
The facts are often conveniently summarized at the beginning of the court’s published opinion. Sometimes, the best statement of the facts will be found in a dissenting or concurring opinion. WARNING! Judges are not above being selective about the facts they emphasize. This can become of crucial importance when you try to reconcile apparently inconsistent cases, because the way a judge chooses to characterize and “edit” the facts often determines which way he or she will vote and, as a result, which rule of law will be applied.
The fact section of a good student brief will include the following elements:
A one or two-sentence description of the nature of the case, to serve as an introduction.
A statement of the relevant law, which allows us to draw attention to the key issue/s that are in dispute. This may take you a couple of sentences
A summary of the relevant facts to explain who did what to whom. Be precise as to what was alleged by one arty against another.
A summary of actions taken by the lower courts, for example: “Plaintiff’s case dismissed; Plaintiff appealed; The trial court’s decision was affirmed by appellate court; Supreme Court granted certiorari; Supreme Court reversed appellate court’s decision and remanded for a new trial.”
3. Issues
The issues or questions of law raised by the facts peculiar to the case are often stated explicitly by the court.
..
With rare exceptions, the outcome of an appellate case will turn on the meaning of a provision of the Constitution, a law, or a judicial doctrine/theory. Capture that provision or debated point in your restatement of the issue.
When noting issues, it may help to phrase them in terms of questions that can be answered with a precise “yes” or “no.” An acceptable means of framing issues would be as follows: “The NJ Supreme Court in John Doe v. Saul Goodman, decided the issue of: “Are all employees in NJ that merely sign applications and begin work without contracts or union protections at will-employees?” The NJ Supreme Court answered in the affirmative, stating that employees that have received no written, oral, or implied representations of just-case employment are at-will employees.
NOTE: Many students misread cases because they fail to see the issues in terms of the applicable law or judicial doctrine than for any other reason. There is no substitute for taking the time to frame carefully the questions, so that they actually incorporate the key provisions of the law in terms capable of being given precise answers. When reading, it may also help to label the issues if there are more than one.
4. Decisions
The decision, or holding, is the court’s answer to a question presented to it for answer by the parties involved or raised by the court itself in its own reading of the case. There are narrow procedural holdings, for example, “case reversed and remanded,” broader substantive holdings which deal with the interpretation of the Constitution, statutes, or judicial doctrines. If the issues have been drawn precisely, the holdings can be stated in simple “yes” or “no” answers or in short statements taken from the language used by the court.
5. Reasoning
The reasoning, or rationale, is the chain of argument which led the judges in either a majority or a dissenting opinion to rule as they did. This should be outlined in a paragraph
6. Separate Opinions
For our purposes, the focus should be on the majority opinion only. This does not mean that you will not be responsible for understanding the dissenting or concurring opinions in the future. For those dissenting/concurring opinions, a few sentences stating why the dissenting/concurring judges disagreed (dissent) or concurred (agreed with the outcome but not for the same reasons set forth by the majority).
7. Analysis
Here the student should evaluate the significance of the case and its impact on future litigants, government, or society.
