From what you know of this case, do you think the jury arrived at the correct decision? If not, why not? If so, why?Explain

An Accusation of Sexual Harassment in Pro Sports.

The jury in a sexual harassment suit brought by a for-mer high-ranking New York Knicks basketball team executive awarded her over $11 million in punitive damages. They did so after hearing testimony during what the New York Times called a “sordid four-week trial.” Officials of the Madison Square Garden (which owns the Knicks) said they would appeal the verdict. However, even if they were to win on appeal (which one University of Richmond Law School professor said was unlikely), the case still exposed the organization and its managers to a great deal of unfavorable publicity. The federal suit pitted Anucha Browne Sanders, the Knicks’ senior vice president of marketing and business operations (and former Northwestern University basket-ball star), against the team’s owner, Madison Square Gar-den, and its president, Isiah Thomas.

The suit charged them with sex discrimination and retaliation. Ms. Browne Sanders accused Mr. Thomas of verbally abus-ing and sexually harassing her over a two-year period, and says the Garden fired her about a month after she complained to top management about the harassment. “My pleas and complaints about Mr. Thomas’s illegal and offensive actions fell on deaf ears,” she said. At the trial, the Garden cited numerous explanations for the dismissal, saying she had “failed to fulfill professional
Pro Sports

4.41 responsibilities.” At a news conference, Browne Sand-ers said that Thomas “refused to stop his demeaning and repulsive behavior and the Garden refused to inter-cede.” For his part, Mr. Thomas vigorously insisted he was innocent, and said, “I will not allow her or anybody, man or woman, to use me as a pawn for their financial gain.” According to one report of the trial, her claims of harassment and verbal abuse had little corroboration from witnesses, but neither did the Garden’s claims that her performance had been subpar After the jury decision came in favor of the plaintiff, Browne Sanders’s lawyers said, “This [decision] confirms what we’ve been saying all along, that [Browne Sanders] was sexually abused and fired for complaining about it.” The Garden’s state-ment said, in part, that “We look forward to presenting our arguments to an appeals court and believe they will agree that no sexual harassment took place.”

Questions

1.Do you think Ms. Browne Sanders had the basis for a sexual harassment suit? Why or why not? 2-18.

2.From what you know of this case, do you think the jury arrived at the correct decision? If not, why not? If so, why?

Last Completed Projects