Identify a safeguard that Janes’ firm could impose that would eliminate or mitigate the threat of each situation to Janes’ independence.

Marie Janes encounters the following situations in doing the audit of a large auto dealership. Janes is not a partner.
1. The sales manager tells her that there is a sale  on new cars that is limited to long-established customers of the dealership. Because her firm has been doing the audit for several years, the sales manager has decided that Janes should also be eligible for the discount.
2. The auto dealership has an executive lunchroom that is available free to employees
above a certain level. The controller informs Janes that she can also eat there any time.
3. Janes is invited to and attends the company’s annual holiday party. When presents
are handed out, she is surprised to find her name included. The present has a value of
approximately $200.
Use the three-step process in the AICPA conceptual framework to assess whether Janes’ independence has been impaired.
a. Describe how each of the situations might threaten Janes’ independence from the
auto dealership.
b. Identify a safeguard that Janes’ firm could impose that would eliminate or mitigate
the threat of each situation to Janes’ independence.
In-class
Discussion
Required
116Part 1 / THE AUDITING PROFESSION
c. Assuming no safeguards are in place and Janes accepts the offer or gift in each situation, discuss whether she has violated the rules of conduct.
d. Discuss what Janes should do in each situation.

© 2020 EssayQuoll.com. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer: For assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper reference.