Topic: Business Ethics discussion post
Read the article in this link:
https://qz.com/1323471/ten-years-after-chinas-melamine-laced-infant-milk-tragedy-deep-distrust-remains/
Then comment in essay format on the query posted below:
The Chinese Communist Party was deeply embarrassed by the debacle described in the article. Many people were prosecuted. A middle-aged party member who was the CEO of the firm that manufactured the baby formula and who had knowledge of the continued use of the tainted powder was given a life sentence, but a peasant who was supplying the tainted powder and a low-level supervisor received capital punishment.
The peasant knew that his milk had to meet a certain, elevated protein benchmark. Whether he knew that melamine is poisonous is not known, nor is it known who advised him to add it to the feed of the cows.
If the purpose of the prosecutions was to restore confidence in using baby formula , was the supreme sanctioning of the bottom of the supply chain and mercy at the top warranted? Explain in essay format
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
