Description
Instructions
Adapted from question 3 (p. 110) in the Driscoll text:
Using the same learning episode, generate a plan for improving performance that is based on cognitive information-processing theory. How does this plan differ from your behavioral plan? What aspects of learning are highlighted by each plan? Are they mutually exclusive or might a combined plan be more effective than either alone? Where can a biblical worldview be implemented within this plan? Incorporate some of Marzano’s suggested strategies from chapters 4-6. As for length, all items of the assignment must be significantly addressed.
This assignment should be geared to your sphere of influence. If you are an administrator, this could apply to a faculty or staff member or a student within the school system. If you are teacher, this could apply to a student within the classroom. If you are not in a school system, it could apply to an individual you supervise.
Rubric
Application of Learning and Cognition
Application of Learning and Cognition
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of theories
25 pts
Exemplary
Behaviorism and Cognitive processing plans were analyzed with differences and aspects of learning were included.
19 pts
Proficient
Behaviorism and Cognitive processing plans were analyzed with differences.
12.5 pts
Needs Improvement
Behaviorism and Cognitive processing plans were listed with aspects of learning included.
6 pts
Hardly Evident
Behaviorism and Cognitive processing plans were not analyzed with differences and aspects of learning were not included.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan
25 pts
Exemplary
Develop a plan to overcome the difficulty and describe how to implement the plan so that it is possible to duplicate.
19 pts
Proficient
Develop a plan to overcome the difficulty and describe how to implement the plan but not enough information to duplicate was given.
12.5 pts
Needs Improvement
Develop a plan to overcome the difficulty, but how to implement was not included.
6 pts
Hardly Evident
Neither the plan or how to implement was included.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
25 pts
Exemplary
There are no punctuation, spelling, capitalization, word choice, and/or grammar mistakes. Proofreading is exceptionally well done.
19 pts
Proficient
There are rare punctuation, spelling, capitalization, word choice, and/or grammar mistakes. Proofreading is evident.
12.5 pts
Needs Improvement
There are a few punctuation, spelling, capitalization, word choice, and/or grammar mistakes. Care not taken in proofreading.
6 pts
Hardly Evident
There are a several punctuation, spelling, capitalization, word choice, and/or grammar mistakes. Care not taken in proofreading.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMarzano Included
25 pts
Exemplary
Implemented Marzano’s concepts and biblical integration within the plan.
19 pts
Proficient
Implemented biblical integration within the plan.
12.5 pts
Needs Improvement
Implemented Marzano’s concepts.
6 pts
Hardly Evident
Did not implement Marzano’s concepts or biblical integration.
25 pts
Total Points: 100
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
